HALF TIME TEAM TALKS

A great test is to ask a player post-game what

the coach said at half-time. Most of them have

no idea. They may remember one or two

things, or they may just remember the essence

of it or the mood of the coach. If you need to

have some influence, it needs to be simple and

there can only be a minimal number of

changes, if changes are needed at all.’

Tony Smith, a straight-talking Aussie (is there any

other kind?), speaks with great authority on

coaching techniques and philosophies across

all sports. It’s his assertion that, in pre-match

speeches particularly, varying your approach

is vital.

‘If you do the same routine it wears thin pretty

quickly. Do you always need to raise your

voice? No way. If you do the same thing all

the time players become immune to the way

that you end up speaking to them. It needs to

be varied and appropriate to that occasion.

‘I like to get my players to build it up themselves

leading into a game. If I feel that they haven’t

built in the right way, that the mood isn’t right,

that’s when I intervene. I make it their

responsibility to get each other ready. It’s not

just the individual, they’d better make sure that

the person next to them is ready to play too.’

Fostering this collective responsibility for

pre-match preparation takes time, but Smith’s

laissez-faire approach seems to work, if his

trophy-rich stint at Leeds Rhinos proved

anything to go by.

Specific philosophies on half-time team talks

are more difficult to pin down. Clearly their

content depends entirely on what has occurred

‘What I say is never

technical, rarely

tactical. Often

it’s supportive.’

For Smith, the key is to decide almost

immediately what elements (tactics, execution,

morale etc) need changing and to use all the

short amount of time available to prepare

your speech.

‘I try not to let it be too reactionary, to have it

well thought out before I deliver. If it needs to

be a bit emotional, I’ll let it be emotional, but I’ll

have already thought that through. It’s fine to

show emotion, but I think it needs to be

controlled emotion.‘The content depends on

how well they’re performing and how well the

plan is being executed or how the opposition

are handling the plan.

‘It’s the duty of the coach to read what is

needed on each occasion. Quite often I will

speak to my assistant coaches about that and

ask, ’Do I need to alter these people tactically

or is it mentally?’ I try to go into it with some

sort of plan and control over the delivery of it.

‘One of the things that a lot of coaches

become guilty of is a commentary of what’s just

happened,’ adds the 43 year old. ‘That’s the

last thing they need – they already know that.

What we need to do is work on the future,

rather than what’s just gone by.’

KEY POINTS TO REMEMBER:

Keep it simple. Limit any

in-game advice to one or

two specific points.

Adapt quickly and decide what

sort of change is needed –

tactical, mental or none at all.

Don’t be reactionary – use

the limited time available to

structure what you want to

say and communicate it in a

controlled way.

Concentrate on what needs

to happen next, not on what

just happened.

Accept that whatever you say,

ultimate responsibility lies with the

player.

‘No matter what you’ve imparted to them, they have to do it.’